A British economist and expert on Ukraine is convinced that the West still does not finance and arm our country sufficiently for a real victory.

Thursday, May 30, 2024
A British economist and expert on Ukraine is convinced that the West still does not finance and arm our country sufficiently for a real victory.

In his blog, Timothy Ash drew attention to the numbers: the West spent $100B a year for the past two years to support Ukraine in its fight. However, Russia is increasing its defense spending to $140B annually, so Western funds are insufficient to allow Ukraine to win.

According to Timothy Ash, to enable a Ukrainian victory, support should be increased to $150B annually, i.e., to $12.5B monthly. However, according to the expert, this is a very difficult political task because a Trump victory will most likely reduce US support to Ukraine by approximately 40%, i.e. to $60B per year.

In turn, Europe is unlikely to be able to finance this $40B deficit and then add another $50B a year. Therefore, Ash calls the use of all $330B of the Russian Central Bank’s frozen assets the only realistic option.

“This is the only way to guarantee a quick Ukrainian victory,” Ash summarized.

 

Support independent journalism team

Dear Ukraine Business News reader, we are a team of 20 Ukrainian journalists, researchers, reporters and editors who would humbly ask for your support.

Previous post
Sweden has provided Ukraine with a record $1.26B military aid package with radar reconnaissance aircraft: What does it change?

Sweden has provided Ukraine with a record $1.26B military aid package with radar reconnaissance aircraft: What does it change?

Next post
The EU wants to start negotiations on Ukraine's accession before Hungary's presidency begins in July.

The EU wants to start negotiations on Ukraine's accession before Hungary's presidency begins in July.

Previous Main Topics